Satan :: essays research papers

orchard apple tree has two lawsuits pending that involve rumor-tracking Web sites. In Apple Computer v. Doe No. 1, et al. (or Apple v. Does for short), the company is suing up to 25 unnamed individuals for misappropriation of trade secretsspecific bothy, leaking Apples hugger-mugger study about(predicate) an unreleased audio product code-named Asteroid to approximate Secret, AppleInsider, and Jason OGradys PowerPage.As part of the discovery process, Apple obtained subpoenas for tout ensemble one-third sites for any and all information related to Asteroid, including the identity of all people who leaked the information, or communications that might reveal said identities. none of the sites is a defendant in the Does suit, though Apple has made see the light that they could be named as defendants if evidence shows that they knowingly published Apples trade secrets (and view Secret is a defendant in a second lawsuit not related to Asteroid).Both Think Secret and AppleInsider ha ve their own e-mail service, so obtaining information about their e-mail records and messages would require subpoenaing the sites themselves, invoking difficulties about journalist privileges. When Apple learned that PowerPage utilise an external e-mail provider, the companys legal team set in query its path of least resistance. Nfox has gone beyond refusal to contest the subpoenathe ISP refused to forebode OGrady that it would not comply with the subpoena before appeals were exhausted. Thats when the electronic Frontier Foundation, representing the three sites, went to court seeking a protective site on OGradys behalf to prevent Nfox from human actioning over the information to Apple.On March 4, lawyers for Apple and for the three subpoenaed sites met in the San Jose courtroom of tops(predicate) Court Judge James P. Kleinberg. They were arguing over the sites motion for a protective order barring Nfox from purenessing Apples subpoenas. It was an acclivitous battle, because one day earlier, Judge Kleinberg tentatively ruled in Apples favor.On March 11, the Judge formalized his preliminary decision, denying the motion for the protective order, leaving Nfox free to honor Apples subpoenas and turn over all information from OGradys e-mail related to Asteroid, including that which may identify the person who sent it to the sites. In the 13-page ruling, Kleinberg essentially told the three sites (the ones who moved to have the subpoenas quashed, hence their reference as movants in the decision) that their perspective as journalists does not matterif they had Pulitzer Prizes, theyd still have to honor the subpoenas.Trade Secrets