Encryption - Regulation of Devices That Code Messages is Not Necessary :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Regulation of Devices That Code Messages is Not Necessary   economy has been proposed to regulate devices that code messages. The Clinton administration believes a better way to add for our public safety is by requiring engineering science that scrambles electronic data for concealment reasons to contain a feature that would stand immediate decoding of whatsoever message, known as a trapdoor feature. The capability to monitor encrypted, private communications, however, does not yield greater public safety since it would construct sense of smell among the mess of constant supervision.   According to government officials, access to scrambled data is undeniable for field security and law-enforcement. On the contrary, the trapdoor feature can work against law-enforcement, furnish criminals with an additional entry point to access and view private communications. Purchases make over the internet, including secure credit card numbers, would be required to a llow immediate decoding when the feature is accessed. Second, personal privacy would be compromised since no one could tell if they were being watched at any given moment. The feeling that Big Brother is watching would always exist. Finally, the trapdoor feature could weaken national security on account of this feature simplifying the means of viewing firmly encrypted messages. Foreign nations might be able to exploit the trapdoor feature and kibosh classified military and intelligence transmissions. For these reasons, the government does not need to create an easier way to access private communications.   Government officials claim requiring the decoding engineering doesnt inevitably mean using the applied science. First, if use isnt intended then the technology would never have been developed. Time, money, and other resources are only spent by people who intend to do something. Second, intent for technology required but inactive is ludicrous. This is as absur d as walking up to a stranger on the street, demanding a $100 bill, and, when they balk at the idea, replying that it wont necessarily be spent. Finally, the only motivation to require technological features is the availability for use. No one would have gone to the trouble to make a bid without the intent of use. The feature would have been a proposed option in technology if it wouldnt necessarily be used. Requiring decoding technology stipulates full intent for use.