Max Weber’s Bureaucracy

In his article entitled Bureaucracy, goo weber considers the structure of offices and management of organizations both public and private. He tries to build up a stereotype of these organizations through the use of a fortune of characteristics that he deems should be possessed by such groups. Furthermore, he also ventures his word of honor into the characteristics of a bureaucratic official. The official to be thought of as bureaucratic thus should qualify these set of characteristics.A person possessing such characteristics is then judged as qualified and appropriate in office. However, if dispossessed of these characteristics, he is not hold up for such positions in office. In expressing these ideas and concepts of bureaucratism, Max weber attempts to impart the substance of office management in organizations. Therefore organizations, if not adopt Webers principles, should create their own set of attributes for each office in their circle to make the organization function t umesce. Weber introduces six fundamental characteristics of a functional bureaucracy.First, he requires that organizations mother a fixed set of rules for each governing argona or portion of the organization (cited in Shafritz, 2005). Each organization should deal different sections with a permanent and delimit scope of governance and duties. Second, there exists in the organization a reliable hierarchy of officials wherein subordinated officials are supervised by higher officials although supervising persons have no absolute power on subordinate officials. Third, the organization should have documentation of its progress and activities through written files.Fourth, officials should have a sound and qualified training to be appropriate for each office. Fifth, although the official has a limited tenure, he is expected to give his best and complete labor for the organization. Last, the set of rules and regulations could be learned by all officials (cited in Shafritz, 2005). al ike these characteristics, Weber also proposes that upon abiding all these characteristics, the position of an official becomes a vocation and that it possesses certain duties, responsibilities, rights and privileges including social security (cited in Shafritz, 2005).The concepts imparted by Weber are of great importance especially to organizational management. Through these characteristics introduced by Weber, the individual seeking to construct an organization could model a working structure of governance and management. Furthermore, it is also helpful to people who wants to restructure the modelling of their organization. It is interesting to note that the author explains his thoughts in a very effectual and comprehensive technique through the use of comparison.He compares his image of a bureaucratic organization with those organizations of ancient history including patrimonialism (cited in Shafritz, 2005). Through this effort, the author convincingly illustrates the advantag es of bureaucracy without even explicitly stating them. As a whole, the concept of bureaucracy was very impressive since it offers an efficient structure of organizational management. Furthermore, Webers explanation of principles both in public office and private stinting organizations makes it more even appealing.Nevertheless, readers would also sentience an ideal concept of bureaucracy that eventually will make them wonder if such ideal principles are actually realistic in nature. Yet again, in real public organizations, these principles are recyclable and applicable applicable in a sense that, bureaucratic organizations should really have a set of rules and duties as well as rights and privileges for officials. Webers bureaucracy is a typical as yet practical structural model of bureaucratic organizations.Its significance lies in its colossal application for budding organizations and reformation of existing organizations. In the real world, useful tips such as these should b e taken into account in creating positions in office. By doing so, the organization becomes more systematized and effective. Thus, generating a clear set of goals and a straightforward means of achieving these goals which is what an organization is all about. Reference Shafritz, J. Ott, J. S. & Jang, Y. S. (2005). judicature Theory. 6th Ed. USA Cengage Learning.