Illinois Employers Essay Example for Free

Illinois Employers EssayThe Illinois WARN reduces the number of employees required for an employers notification, which should be done 60 days advance, in case of determineoffs or closing. It reduces from 100 (as set by the federal WARN) to not less than 75 full-time employees who has a combined working time of 4,000 hours or more per week. Also, 33% and at least 25 full-time employees or at least 250 full-time employees ar required for mass lay offs which is half(a) the requirement of the federal WARN. Other government officials mustiness also be informed in case of reallocation. Noncompliance with the Act suffer be brought in the federal court by the cin one caserned employees.COMMENT 1 Indeed, theses laws will have good impact in the community and may also fall the unemployment rate. However, it will also trigger a fear on the side of the employer. Upon receiving a notice 60 days before the closing or lay off, the employees will certainly look for a job. There, they may be propagation when the employees will leave their job even before the closing period once they find a new job. However, notification in such cases (closing or lay off and reallocation) will surely benefit the community will surely benefit the community as a whole for unemployment is sure to decrease.WARN really secures the employees affaire by taking away the fear of being laid-off all of a sudden. Thus, employees will really feel secure as long WARN is in place since there is a law that protects their interest and work security. They are also more secure because noncompliance to the laws imposed by WARN can be brought to the federal court in which employers can be required to pay for the 60 days of non-notification. ESSAY 2 Almost all members of the community will be affected by the finale especially the smokers or costumers as well as the tobacco growers, manufacturers and the stores.The store has no obligation to not hurt tourism since every business is muster out to offe r what product or services that they want provided that they didnt violate the law. Neda does not set aside business morality since even business morals does not impose compulsory merchandising of tobacco. It is more like being responsible to the community since they aim to prevent lawsuits and criminal penalties due to unavoidable selling of tobacco to minors. COMMENT 1 Smokers and non-smokers are the ones that are truly affected by the ratiocination to ban tobacco selling within the community.Neda does have the right-hand(a) to sell whatever she see fit thus, business ethics was not violated. Neda also have no responsibility on the tourism industry since what the conclusiveness she had made was meant for her own store only and not for the whole community. It just so happen that more and more agreed to her decision. However, there are times that business and personal ethics does not go hand in hand. There are times that in order to protect your personal ethics, you must violat ed business ethics and vice versa. Personal ethics is not a requirement of business ethics although most of the time, personally ethical are also business ethical.COMMENT 2 The stake holders that are mentioned are indeed the affected people by the decision. However, the most affected remains the consumers of the product, the smokers. They are the most affected because they are the ones that really depend on the use of the product. Regarding Nedas decision, it is also right to say that both personal and business ethics had been taken for consideration. Another proof that showed that business ethics was also considered is that Neda protected not only the citizens but as well as the workers who are legitimately punished for selling tobacco on minors.It is also the concern of business ethics to ensure that their employees are doing legal jobs. Also, rather than decrease in tourism, the decision may also serve as a ground to increase tourism because of the good image that the community is able to portray. The tourists do not natter the community to smoke in the first place. It is also natural there are people that will accommodate those smokers who are suffering from the decision.ReferenceCraft, M. Diljohn, J. (2005). youthful Illinois WARN Act Imposes Additional Requirements on Illinois Employers. Retrieved July 19, 2008 from http//library.findlaw. com/2005/Mar/10/163974. html Employment and Training Administration United States Department of Labor. (No Date). Workers Guide to Advance visor of Closing and Layoffs. Retrieved July 19, 2008 from http//www. doleta. gov/layoff/pdf/WorkerWARN2003. pdf. Federwisch, A. (June 2006). Assessing for Ethics. Retrieved July 19, 2008 from http//www. scu. edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/business/assessing. html. White, Maj Gen Jerry. (1996). Personal Ethics Versus Professional Ethics. Retrieved July 19, 2008 from http//www. airpower. maxwell. af. mil/airchronicles/apj/apj96/sum96/white. html.